Politico: Pretending Western interests are fully aligned with Kiev’s risks further escalating the war

Insisting that the United States and its NATO allies should want exactly what Ukraine does is understandable politics — but it’s also dangerous policy.
 
Such insistence not only risks dragging us potentially into a nuclear war, it also risks giving Ukraine false hope and delaying a settlement. And our natural sympathy for Ukraine shouldn’t be confused for fully aligned interests.
 
Throughout the West, Russia’s invasion has prompted a widespread outpouring of support and solidarity. NATO members have helped frustrate Russia and have enabled Ukraine to mount an effective resistance with arms transfers, intelligence sharing and economic sanctions. And civil society has mobilized aid, making the Ukrainian flag a popular symbol of heroic defiance, internationalism and the survival of sovereign liberty.
 
For British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, “one of the proudest boasts in the free world is, ‘Ya Ukrainets’ — ‘I am a Ukrainian’.” According to U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, “our job is to support the Ukrainians. They’ll set the military objectives, the objectives at the bargaining table . . . we’re not going to define the outcome of this for them. That is up for them to define and us to support them in.” Even President Joe Biden argues Ukraine is not just a humanitarian cause for the U.S. but a frontline state in a global war between freedom and autocracy.
 
At the same time, however, the British and U.S. governments have also made it clear that they will not give Ukraine all the weapons it wants or directly enter the conflict by imposing a no-fly zone or deploying troops. That reluctance reflects an obvious divergence of interests between the West’s and Kiev’s.
 
Ukraine, with its independence on the line, wants all the NATO help it can get — escalation serves its interests. NATO countries on the other hand, sensibly wary of Russia and its nuclear arsenal, rightly resist.
 
So, a gap has opened in Western capitals between deeds that suggest an outer limit of involvement and words that suggest a harmony of interests.
 
In large part, this is just politics. Leaders of democracies tend to oversell the stakes to promote policies that entail great risk. But such a gap is dangerous.
 
https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-russia-war-nato-eu-us-alliance-solidarity/
 
 
You might also like
Latest news
Al-Dahhak: Security Council's failure to fulfill its responsibilities encourages Israeli occupation ... ICC issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant over war crimes Two Syrian films participate in the first session of the Fayoum Film Festival in Cairo   Gaza Media Office: The Israeli occupation committed four brutal massacres after the Security Council... 22 martyrs as a result of Israeli air raids on a number of Lebanese regions With Syria’s participation, Arab aviation institutions discuss enhancing cooperation and exchanging ... President of the Russian Republic of Bashkortostan: The West's hostile stance against Syria and Russ... Putin discusses with Iraqi PM the unprecedented escalation in Middle East Palestinian Foreign Ministry: Politicizing aid deepens famine in Gaza  A Workshop on the situation of the financing market for micro and small-sized enterprises next Satur... Syrian men's basketball team will meet its Bahraini counterpart in the second stage of Asian Cup qua... Iranian official: Anti-Iran resolution in Third Committee of General Assembly is a political and ill... Palestinian Resistance: The massacre committed by the Israeli occupation in Beit Lahia is a result o... Nicaragua condemns Israeli aggression on Syrian city of Palmyra Syrian-Iraqi talks to enhance work and coordination in environmental protection field Sabbagh, Ghalibaf hold talks in Tehran United Nations renews rejection of "Israel" imposing its laws on occupied Syrian Golan Two people martyred in Israeli raids on the towns of Rumin and Beit Lilf, Lebanon 66 Palestinians martyred in new Israeli massacre in Jabalia Nebenzia: Washington's use of veto against the resolution to stop aggression is inhumane