Press TV has recently conducted an interview with Anas Jaboua, with the Syrian Social Club from London. The interview tackled the situation on the ground in Syria and the ongoing political moves in this regard. Mr. Jaboua asserted the need for the political solution and that Hand by hand, the operations for the Syrian army are being carried on as well, such as in Khirbet Ghazaleh in Dara’a or in al-Qusayr ; in the middle of Syria or if we go over to the northern side of Syria in Aleppo in al-Aziziah. What we can say is enough is enough, we need a political solution but yet as we can see on the American side, the American side is not resting on one decision.
On one hand they say yes we are in need for a political solution for the area. political solution will bring stability again to the Middle East, to the whole area; but on the other hand what we can see is that they are always funding and helping the armed militias or the Islamic groups such as al-Nusra, which they listed al-Nusra on the terrorist page
On the other hand, as well we can see Turkey, they are talking about a political solution, but under the table as well they are funding the militant groups. So in reality, when we say who is speaking and targeting for the political solution, we can see Russia, we can see Iran, we can see Syria. Yes, they are targeting for a political solution to stop the conflict in Syria.
Jaboua pointed out that the other side, which is the Western countries or the countries which supported these armed groups, they do not aim for a political solution, they aim to create instability in Syria and keep this area in such a mess. So therefore they are heading towards creating the sectarian war or the civil war not only in Syria, but they are also heading towards creating this war again … in Lebanon after being stopped many years ago. So they are heading to create this war in Jordan as well. Therefore, what they are aiming is, just to create a civilian war, which can create instability for the whole area and that can give the war country, which is Israel, give stability because the whole area is in war Israel is in rest.
However, this very ”war country” is never to be ”in rest” once the region is burning; it is Israel itself which would emerge to be the big loser at the end of the day. The occupation of others’ territories, launching raids and aggressions against sovereign States, and the persistent rejection of UN Security Council resolutions, not to mention, of course, the Israeli flagrant and foolish support for al-Qaeda affiliates in the armistice zone would but add to its would be big loss.
M.A.