No one can deny the disgraceful and flagrant role of the US diplomacy that appears clearly from the very beginning of the crisis in Syria. This can be noticed obviously in an interview of the US Secretary of State, John Kerry on “ABC” when he justified the US stance regarding re-arming the terrorist organizations that had been attacked on the Turkish border by other factions which are formed by Al-Saud Kingdom. Accordingly, Mr. Kerry has asserted that the US “non-lethal” aid may continue very quickly.
Without any doubt, this is the US contradictory policy, and the head of this diplomacy Mr. John Kerry is talking about arming the terrorists in Syria and at the same time he says that no one wants to be involved in a war against Syria.
Mr. Kerry has added that the US administration relies on diplomacy to resolve the conflict in Syria. In fact, all the statements of the US officials especially its Secretary of State John Kerry, show clearly the US contradiction and dodgy policy.
Robert Ford, the US former ambassador to Syria, announced during a television interview that his country’s stance doesn’t change towards the crisis in Syria. He added that the US decision regarding suspending the “non-lethal” aid is due to the security conditions. Ford’s declaration is considered a strong evidence that the US supports terrorism in Syria.
This is the terroristic diplomacy which is practiced by the US in Syria about three years ago. Indeed, the US and its allies, especially those Gulf financers of arms, are still waiting for achieving a balance on the Syrian ground that serves their interests.
In this context, according to a recent report of the US magazine “Foreign Policy”, there was an arming deal between Saudi Arabia and one of the US companies by which Al-Saud Kingdom gets (15 000) anti-tank missile worth about one billion dollars.
Undoubtedly, the deal has been completed, therefore we have to wonder where these weapons will go to? It is known that these types of weapons are used mainly in ground operations.
The “Foreign Policy” magazine had mentioned that the US does not admit with this deal, of course, it is not true. Because according to American laws such kinds of deals cannot be achieved without the acceptance of the state. The US and its allies have no need to deny their supporting terrorism, and Al-Saud Wahhabi Kingdom has unabashedly declared that they are arming the terrorists in Syria.
Thus, is there any doubt about the US contradictory diplomacy towards the crisis in Syria. In fact, the US is considered the main supporter and sponsor of the terrorism in the region as a whole. In addition, the US recent statements about the crisis in Syria and its agreement with Russia on the Geneva2 Conference are but to waste time.
Ahmad Orabi Ba’aj
E&T: M.Wassouf