Savage crime serving Zionist project in the region

The coward terrorist crime that hit Beirut last Tuesday targeting the Iranian Embassy, claiming the lives of 23 civilians and wounding 146 others is similar to other previous crimes which are registered on the record of terrorism of some countries that are backing such extremist thoughts. The twin blasts are an inhumane crime and a spiteful measure by the Zionist regime and its mercenaries in the region.

The terrorist blast aims to explode the situation in Lebanon and plunge the whole region in internal sectarian conflicts that pave the way for the US and Israel to dominate the Arab region politically and economically. This terrorist crime targets the Resistance axis in the region to serve the interests of the Zionist entity which has become friends with some Arab regimes in the Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia and Qatar.  The terrorist thought, which is supported by Arab and western intelligence agencies, including the Israeli intelligence to implement the Zionist American project in the region, which aims, among other things, to weaken the resistance axis to perpetuate the Israeli occupation of the Arab territories, plunder Arab resources and revive old colonialist interests of Britain, France and the US. This coward attack reflects the involvement of terrorism makers and funders in the region and their insistence on spreading terrorism as behaviour, practice and a culture to undermine the region and its future and advocate divisions and sectarian wars among the peoples of the region. The Petro-dollar is smelled in the terrorism hitting the states of the region Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, because Bandar and his ilk were ordered by the US and Israel to press ahead with terrorist acts as the American Zionist project in the region was foiled thanks to the high awareness of Syrian people, the valiant Syrian armed forces and the adherence of the Lebanese national resistance to its noble principles. 

Certain countries in the region such as Saudi Arabia and some Gulf states and Israel want to promote the culture of terrorism and spread it in the region. Those who oppose a political solution to Syria are behind the terrorist attacks, because the political solution of the crisis in Syria means a humiliating defeat to the US and its regional and Arab tools who want to destroy Syria and end its pivotal role in the region. The states which claim to be fighting terrorism, especially the US and its allies are supporting terrorism in the region through offering huge funds to finance al-Qa’eda- linked terrorism fighting in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq and providing them with sophisticated weapons to achieve malignant political objectives.

The deadly twin bombings outside the Iranian Embassy in the Lebanese capital serve the interests of the Israeli regime in the region. The terrorist crime in Beirut comes in service of the Israeli enemy and its allies. It offers a direct service to the Israeli enemy and the states which are implementing the Zionist project in the region.

 However, the new savage crime will only increase the determination of the Lebanese national resistance and the peoples in the region to achieve their goal in defeating the Israeli-U.S. project in the region and liberating the occupied Arab territories.

K.Q.

Preconditions prolong crisis in Syria

The latest developments and diplomatic efforts have shown without any shade of doubt that there are certain states that are putting their political and financial weight to prevent the convening of the Geneva Conference. By so doing, they prolong the crisis of the Syrian people and increase their suffering. Setting a timeline for the long-awaited Geneva II Syria talks has failed so far due to the obstacles and pre-conditions created by the foreign-backed opposition at the orders of its masters in some Western and regional states. The so-called National Coalition is only a front for the Saudi intelligence, and the question to be raised is “Who does the coalition represent? Is it Al Qaeda or Jabhat al-Nusra or other terrorist groups fighting in Syria?” There is a huge difference between the media talk and the people who are residing in luxurious hotels on one side and the children who are being killed, the families who are being displaced and the mosques, churches, museums and factories that are being burnt and destroyed just because Saudi Arabia and other regional and Western forces have their own agendas in Syria. Some of the forces of the so-called opposition, facing the Syrian government with the most violent means, are non-Syrian coming from various parts of the world to get money from Bandar and other supporters in the Gulf.

The date of the long-delayed event has changed many times as Syria's foreign-backed opposition remains divided over participating in the meeting.  From the very beginning the Syrian government’s stand was very clear in accepting to participate in the conference without preconditions. The Syrian government has agreed to go to Geneva without preconditions, but the problem is that some sides are promoting only the idea of transitional authority because these sides created this idea and this kind of opposition, which is affiliated to external sides and it is unknown who it really represents. The Syrian government will go to the conference from a position of strength. The unity of the Syrian army and the great victories it realized in eliminating terrorist gathering and restoring security and stability to various Syrian areas, and the unity of all establishments in Syria, despite all pressures and flow of arms and funds, are what have basically made the situation on the ground in favour of the Syrian people and state.

If the US is really willing to hold Geneva Conference, it should order its regional and Arab tools to halt the influx of arms, funds and terrorists to Syria. There is a need for putting an end to terrorism and violence in the region so that it does not turn into a fertile area for further extremism in the whole region. There is also an urgent need to unify the opposition groups which should take into consideration that the Syrians are the only party who decide their future. The Syrian government’s agreement on Geneva II is based on the exclusive right of the Syrian people to choose their political future, to choose their leaders and to reject all forms of external intervention. All parties should sit at the table and talk based on the Syrian national interest to come out with a solution with everybody's agreement. The conference should provide the Syrians with the opportunity to solve their issues and draw up their future without foreign interference.

K.Q.

Syria becomes largest home to al Qaeda

Analysts said the number of al Qaeda fighters in Syria could exceed 12,000 because an estimated 800 to 2,500 affiliated jihadists are on the country’s border with Iraq, the Washington Times reported.

“Syria represents the biggest and best opportunity al Qaeda has had for a very long time to establish a truly concrete presence anywhere in the Muslim world,” said IHS Jane’s Mr. Lister.

As a magnet for foreign jihadists, Syria is harboring a unique danger.

Clinton Watts, senior researcher at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia, said foreign fighters form the backbone of al Qaeda’s global network and are the ones who carry out spectacular attacks for the organization such as September’s attack on the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya, in which at least 61 civilians were killed.

“They’re there for al Qaeda’s big objectives,” Mr. Watts said. “In Syria, right now, there are some operational leaders, probably dozens of them, that are going to be our next big problem. They’re running the show there.”

Syria also stands alone among the places where foreign fighters have joined the jihadist movement over the past decade, including Somalia, Yemen, Libya and Mali, he added.

“There’s only one place it has stuck, and that is Syria,” he said.

“Each of these conflicts in the region generates a new series of networks — funders, suppliers, moneymen — and all of these networks get turned to whatever new conflict that comes up,” Mr. Watts said. “Someday the Syria conflict is going to stop raging, but these networks are going to be there, and the fighters are still going to be there.”

William McCants, a Middle East researcher at the Brookings Institution, said Syria’s strategic location and porous borders make it a particularly attractive safe haven for jihadists.

“Syria is also right next door to Israel, and a cherished dream for jihadis of all stripes is to finally take the battle to Israel,” Mr. McCants said.

Analysts said al Qaeda is operating unfettered in Syria, in part because of the Obama administration’s limited counterterrorism tools: It cannot use drones without violating Syrian airspace, and it cannot deploy special operations forces in the country without joining and escalating the war.

“The reason we’re not intervening in Syria is because we realized after Libya [that] we can’t keep control of everything the way we would like, and it opens up a can of worms,” said Mr. Watts. “We have let this be a safe haven, and that is why they are going there.”

Al Qaeda fighters are bringing heavy weaponry from Syria into Iraq and have become an increasing threat in the past eight months, a senior administration official declared.

“It is a fact now that al Qaeda has a presence in western Iraq, and it has a presence in terms of camps and training facilities and staging areas that the Iraqi forces are unable to target effectively,” the official said.

Al Qaeda forces in Iraq and Syria are so linked that U.S. officials now consider that al Qaeda in Iraq has essentially become one entity with the self-styled ISIS (the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). Another al Qaeda affiliate is fighting in Syria — Jabhat al-Nusra. 

M.A.

Neutral mediator should call things by their names

It has been crystal clear the US and its allies have been employing the UN and its affiliated bodies in service of the global war against Syria. Moreover, the US and its regional tools have also employed the UN special envoy to Syria Lakhdar al-Brahimi who has been making contradictory statements concerning the solution of the crisis in Syria. This has been clearly manifested during his recent regional tour in preparation for the Geneva Conference. Al-Ibrahimi has made many paradoxical statements, some of which were beyond his capacity as a UN envoy, interfering in Syria’s internal affairs. It seems that he wanted to please some parties at the expense of Syrian people. He speaks different languages when he is inside or outside Syria.

The UN envoy has avoided calling things by their names and spelling out the real stances, opting instead for phrases that reflect selective stands and incomplete information.  He abstained from naming al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra and the other terrorist armed gangs which have been carrying out massacres and sabotage acts against Syrian people for two years and a half, and which are responsible for the suffering of Syrian people and hindering the solution of the crisis. If he wants to be a neutral envoy and an honest broker, al-Ibrahimi has to name things by their names. He didn't even have the courage to name those countries which are supporting these terrorist groups, especially Saudi Arabia and Turkey which have been hosting funding and training armed groups and sending them to Syria to commit savage and brutal massacres against Syrian people.

One of the main illogical and contradictory statements made by al-Ibrahimi is that he tried to make an equation between the government and the armed terrorist groups. Brahimi's attempt to equate the armed terrorist groups with the Syrian state reflects his weak reading of the political and field situation in Syria. The existence of al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra and other al-Qa’eda linked terrorist groups, which represent international terrorism in Syria, make such equation inexplicable, unsound and prejudiced. The Syrian army’s repelling of the armed terrorist groups is a legal act and a national duty that is guaranteed by the international law and the Syrian Constitution. The Syrian army and armed forces are defending the Syrian state, Syrian people and their public and private properties against terrorists who came from various parts to the globe to destroy Syria, create chaos and incite sectarian conflicts in Syria and the Arab region.

Another drawback that appeared in al-Ibrahimi’s recent statements is his talk about the humanitarian situation. In his capacity as a UN envoy, Brahimi's job has nothing to do with the humanitarian assistance file. The Syrian government is doing its best to deliver humanitarian aid to every citizen that needs it in light of the current crisis and this issue is a prime concern for Syria.

 The Syrian government is dispatching humanitarian aid convoys, organized by the UN, the Syrian Arab Red Crescent Organization (SARC), the International Red Cross and all humanitarian governmental organizations and NGOs, to the trapped civilians, especially in hotspots, according to mechanisms that ensures that relief aid reach those in need.

 It is clear that raising such an issue was at the request of some certain outside party to deviate him from his own mission. Brahimi was acting outside his powers when he discussed the humanitarian situation in Syria during. When he was appointed a UN envoy he was not charged with this issue.

If he wants to make success in his mission, al-Ibrahimi should not exceed his powers and job as a UN envoy and this requests him to be a neutral, even-handed and true mediator who calls things by their names.

K.Q.

Explicit and implicit attitude towards Geneva Conference

It has been unanimously agreed that the sole way to solve the crisis in Syria is through a comprehensive dialogue conducted among the Syrians themselves. To achieve this goal, the international community has agreed to hold Geneva conference by the end of November.  The international community's mission is to create favourable foreign conditions for the Syrian internal dialogue. All countries should contribute to convincing the concerned parties in Syria to sit at the dialogue table. This conference should be a platform for the Syrians to hold talks on their future in a democratic way without any foreign interference or imposed foreign decisions.

Unfortunately, many international sides are providing financial support and weapons to the armed groups in Syria, including chemical weapons. There is a clear contradiction in the explicit and implicit policies of some influential states, especially the US and its allies. Overtly, the US claimed that it supported the political solution to the crisis in Syria through convening the Geneva Conference, but covertly, the US, its allies and regional and Arab tools are the main factors that hinder the settlement of the crisis in Syria through encouraging terrorist acts and offering unlimited support for the armed terrorist groups to press ahead with their criminal acts against Syrian people and their public and private properties and to perpetuate the suffering of the Syrian people and prolong the crisis so that the US and its allies can implement their agenda in the region which aims at weakening the resistance against occupation and achieve colonialist and political interests. The foreign guardians of the armed groups are the ones interested in foiling the international conference on Syria due to be held in Geneva. About 19 factions of the armed groups fighting in Syria, which are unable to work without foreign support, have rejected Geneva 2 conference and their backers want to foil the conference.

 The success of the conference is connected to drying out all sources of terrorism and break off the road in front of the states which support the gunmen. The success of any political solution is connected with stopping support for the terrorist groups and exerting pressure on their sponsoring states that are facilitating the entry of terrorists and mercenaries into the Syrian land and providing them with money, arms and various forms of logistic support. Halting support to the armed terrorist groups is the most important step to create favourable conditions for dialogue and setting up clear mechanisms to achieve the desired goals.

The Syrian people are the only side entitled to draw Syria's future and any solution or agreement in this regard must have the approval of the Syrians and reflect their desires away from any foreign interference or diktat.

K.Q.