Breaking News

Trump's Philosophy ... Management by Chaos and Force

The US president does not act or take his decisions in vain or by accident or mood. The truth is that President Trump stems from a political philosophy he believes in and seeks to devote it as an approach in America's handling of the international system and based on two fundamental principles: management by chaos, management by surplus of capital strength and military power.

Perhaps what prompted President Trump to choose that approach and philosophy is the international situation that, over the past ten years, represented in the rise of military, economic and political forces that compete with the United States which believed that it became the world's undisputed leader after the fall of the former Soviet Union and the collapse of the socialist system and what followed that of ideological prelude to the theorists of neo-conservatives and globalization as an economic and cultural context, whether Leo Strauss or Samuel Huntington to Francis Foucault Yama, who closed the history of the American model that must be pursued because it, as he claimed, is the ideal picture of human evolution and the roof of knowledge and freedom.

The United States launched two costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq accompanied with a trend of unprecedented domination and authority on the international scene and its organizations whether the Security Council or other institutions.After that, forces rejecting the idea of hegemony emerged as a reaction to this trend calling for partnership in the leadership of the world based on the sharing of benefits and balance in international relations and respect for the sovereignty of States and the implementation of the Charter of the United Nations to be the decisive criterion. In parallel with those calls that found a good echo at the international level rose the star of the People's Republic of China as an effective economic force and Russia as a military and economic force seeking to restore their roles in the international scene. Other regional and international forces with their economic, political and military weight, such as India, Brazil, South Africa and Iran have also emerged causing a political headache for the American, who thought he had grabbed the international game.

Those forces began to face the American in more than one arena, whether the Security Council or other organizations in addition to the hotbeds of military conflict in various forms and the American suffers defeats or prevent him from the achievement of successes he hoped. Perhaps the second term of the former President Barack Obama was the most expressive image of this situation that made the neo-conservative trend rooted in the American institutions describing him as the weak and hesitant one who lost Uncle Sam's prestige.

In those climates, President Donald Trump, the businessman, came to the White House adopting a popular speech on the one hand and arrogant on the other. He gathered a wide audience both on the street level,  and cartels in addition to his tickling of the feelings of the Jewish lobby,permeating in the joints of American life.Trump started his constitutional mandate with a speech about America,crying on the lost position and prestige of America due to the former weak President, Obama, and his administration, pledging to restore America's dominant role in the world through the surplus of the financial and military powers, in violation of all international conventions and the international organizations and paying no attention to the American sovereign institutions, including the US Congress, the Pentagon, the CIA, and the media, which he considered hostile to him and his policies, so we saw him turning his back to them all adopting Twitter diplomacy and ignoring all the other traditional media.

We can conclude that we are facing an unprecedented situation in the White House and that we are facing a president who does not care about international institutions, their commitments and charters, nor America's obligations as a state. The proof of this is what happened in the nuclear agreement with Iran and the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of the Zionist entity and last but not least his recognition of the so-called Israeli sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan.

In all that has been mentioned, it contravenes international laws, the Charter of the United Nations and international legitimacy, which means that president Trump has his own agenda to establish two fundamental issues in international relations: the power of arms and the strength of money, rather than international law, international institutions and the principle of sovereignty, because he is convinced that America no longer controls the Security Council and its resolutions or other organizations emanating from the United Nations, so the US has to exercise its economic and military power to control the world or seize it by the threat of military or financial power and its fuel is the US dollar the old new weapon.

Trump, coming from the business and financial circles, sees in America an economic company and a security institution for protection for money and its strength and continued influence call for its declaration (Black water) and dealing with it according to that image and model and perhaps the Arab Gulf countries are the first that took it for granted, by giving bountifully billions of dollars to him in a visit to the gulf a year ago and what followed that of forms of financial blackmail and political bullying expressed in more than one position. Perhaps Trump's policy of force will cause him the complex of Thiazides, which means the sense of surplus power, that consequently leads to destruction, as happened earlier between Athens and Sparta, and recently Germany and the allies, and later Iraq and Kuwait. The excess of power that was wrongly used in the three examples destroyed who employed it and devastated those countries. Does Trump learn the lesson?

Sharif Al -Khatib
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Escalation and Militarization ... American Recipe for a New Investment in Terrorism

A state of an unprecedented hysteria hit the administration of Donald Trump today, and the arrows of its arrogance flying towards everywhere that broke the prestige of the United States… The moment that Syria, which is determined to complete the liberation of all its lands from the abomination of terrorism and its supporters, is resisting the biggest share of these arrows that increase with the return of the aggression system to play again on the chord of the threat and intimidation, to save the remaining terrorist organizations in the area of reducing escalation. Whereas the recipe of " the chemical weapons " and its operational tools are ready to be applied by French, Belgians and Moroccan experts and other mercenaries, before the trio of American, French and British terrorism sets its watch on Trump's timer, until the time of pressure and blackmail runs out to block the progress of the Syrian Arab Army in its war against the terrorists of "al -Nusra" and those who rally under their banner.

Trump's administration removed the political solution from the dictionary of its agenda prepared for Syria. It prefers to preserve its terrorist organizations to perpetuate its occupation. Here the role of its executive tools appears, such as the Erdogan regime, the main guarantor of terrorists. In the area of escalation reduction, the field data revealed today that Erdogan is the exclusive American agent who directs the terrorist war in that region with its terrorist tools, starting with the mercenaries of "al -Nusra", not ending with the so-called "Euphrates Shield."

 According to the information received, the terrorists are equipped with the latest Turkish weapons from missiles, vehicles and armors, and take orders from the operations rooms created by Erdogan's officers for this purpose. This proves that Erdogan has never been willing to contribute to finding a political solution to the crisis, but to working under the American administration to prolong it. The previous 'Astana' tours were only time-consuming stations for the Turkish regime, all of which were used to restore the ranks of the terrorist originations and strengthen their redeployment in the rural areas of Idlib and Hama instead of working on the withdrawal of terrorists and their weapons as previously agreed upon in Sochi.

The US is putting the entire region on a hot plate and mobilizing against Syria and Iran and the entire axis of resistance, but that does not mean that it will be the winner, because today it is, with the poles of the aggression, captive to the reality of the equations imposed by the resistance forces. The threat of the lie of the "the chemical weapons" will not deter the Syrian state from continuing its war against terrorism until it is uprooted and all fleets, aircraft carriers and soldiers who were brought to the Gulf will not subjugate Iran.

 The United States knows this well, contrary to some Arabs who hurry behind the imposition of the "deal of the century", in its economic, political and military cover, and those who are unable to read the changes that have taken place. They do not want to believe that the Trump's parade in the Gulf is only to complete the depletion of its "milky cow" under the protection of the dilapidated monarchies, in exchange for generous payment, until the end of Trump's presidential mission.

The American fanfare to militarize the situation in the region and the world is nothing more than a door to the sale of accumulated American weapons and the attempt to establish the US hegemony of the collapse of the unilateral polarity against the rise of other powers such as Russia, China, India, Iran and others. The American uproar has not yet succeeded in Venezuela or the DPRK or in the trade war against China, so the time of beating the drums of the American war will always remain in the Trump's refrigerator, his profits from blackmailing in the region are a thousand times better than losing one soldier on the battlefield, or destroying one warship.

Sharif Al -Khatib


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


The Lies of the West Won't Protect Terrorism

The United States has never given up playing the chord of terrorism in its various forms and whenever that terrorism is defeated on the ground or Washington fails to invest it in politics, it resorts to the scenario of the "chemical weapons" that it uses as Trojan horse to keep its terrorists on the ground and continue its occupation to parts of the Syrian Arab territories. It also resorts to the method of lying today in the hope that repeated lying can be credible, even the Western media itself has unveiled all these allegations on the basis of real evidences far from misinformation and falsification.

What is Trump betting on?

Certainly, Trump can't understand why Iran, people and government, rejects to negotiate with him, even though he has recently made an explicit call to this effect. During the past two years, he also made eleven attempts to negotiate, but the Iranians refused as their President, Mr. Rouhani, revealed.

After using sanctions and siege, reviewing the military force and making threats and intimidation, the US President believes he could get into negotiations that satisfy his desires and please Zionists, fancying  that these negotiations could have a serious effect and end the intensity of Iranian rejection and drives them to exploit what appears to be a golden opportunity provided by Trump to the Iranians.

Obviously, what Trump is trying hard, using the policy of stick and carrot, is to reach a bilateral nuclear understanding in which Iran gives up nuclear technology, especially that the US withdrawal from the nuclear agreement did not lead to its collapse, nor to the withdrawal of any other party including Iran, which has held on to it. The rights and obligations that Iran has gained from the nuclear agreement aroused the anger of the Zionists, who consider the agreement will enable Tehran to achieve its military nuclear objectives, so they launched their campaign against the agreement, and they were the main instigator to make the US withdraw from it.

Trump knows very well that for almost forty years the United States has tried every large and soft means of subjugating the Islamic Republic, changing its anti-imperialist and Zionist regime, but Iran has thwarted all the American conspiracies that have targeted it and emerged stronger and more adherence to its resistant, ideological and political approach. Trump's expectations will go to the ways of the winds as his predecessors failed to achieve anything.

 Some believe that Trump's sweeping pressure on Iran and its harsh punitive measures have put the Iranians in a great predicament that they will not succeed in getting out of this time unless they reach an agreement with the US President and listen to his terms. But this view is arbitrary and naive, because it does not weigh or take into account the enormous experience that the Iranians accumulated in facing this kind of challenge, aside from the fact that the Iranian popular discontent with America has increased and lost confidence in it, in addition to the growing strength of the anti-American camp which Iran is one of its main forces.

All these factors simply mean that Iran is not in a position to bow to any American dictates whatever Trump's carrot and stick size are, nor even to negotiate with him as long as he has no political and moral credibility qualify him for that.

So, what is this man betting on, who cannot see the region except with the eyes of the Zionists?!

This question is really puzzling, the bet on US military force is not logical, the US and Israel will not be able to bear the consequences of any US aggression on Iran. Either bet on changing Iran's initial position is a kind of the sever political and strategic shortcoming that is explained by the inability of Trump's mentality to understand that the political positions of some countries such as Iran are not goods to be bought and sold, and not deals to be concluded under intimidation and attraction.

It is difficult for a man of American deals to understand that he is dealing with a state of political and strategic constants that are inseparable from its cultural and moral authority, in addition, that Iran masters the art of politics and diplomacy to the extent that Trump himself appears before it to be a failed student with no future.


Sharif Al -Khatib


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Washington and Its Wars Against Humanity

The United States has waged wars against nations and peoples by allegations of spreading "democracy", "fighting terrorism", "defending" the peoples’ rights and for "humanitarian" reasons, but the facts prove the opposite of its allegations.

The "democracy" and the defense of the people and humanity are not the concerns of the United States at all except insofar as it used them as pretexts to its dirty wars to impose its hegemony, plunder the resources and wealth of others, shed more of their blood, and destroy their state and infrastructure completely. How can any sane person be convinced that Washington's wars are for “democracy, peoples and humanity?”