Slovakian political analyst has underscored that the definition of aggression in the United Nations Resolutions applies to what the United States and its allies do in Syria.

Branislav Fábry was quoted by the Slovakian Novéslovo website as saying : “Syria is still a sovereign state under international law, and thus the principle of the sovereign equality of States under Article 2 of the UN Charter applies to it.It follows that no other state may operate in the territory of Syria without the consent of the Government or without the approval of the UN Security Council.The definition of aggression, as approved by the UN General Assembly (No. 3314/1974), unambiguously confirms that the US and its allies commit acts of aggression on the territory of Syria.”

It’s not just war and terrorism that have contributed to destruction in Syria and to the destabilization of its economy. Punitive measures imposed by the US and the EU have transformed a once prosperous country into an aid-dependent nation. The chief doctor of a government-run maternity hospital in Aleppo revealed the struggling conditions the hospital has found itself in.

It was not long ago that Aleppo was liberated from terrorists. The raging war however was not the only horror which devastated the city. Officials also blame the sanctions, introduced by the US and the EU, for the desperate need of medical equipment, fuel, food and building materials.

The White House purposely unleashes fake news about the use of chemical weapons in Syria in order to change the current situation for the interest of American plans, Tereza Spencerová  told the Czech 'Parliamentary Papers' website.

The Czech Journalist, who is specialized in Middle East Affairs, said: "The U.S. threat to launch a new attack against Syria under the pretext of the use of chemical weapons comes despite Washington's previous attack on the Syrian airfield was launched with no evidence about the use of chemical weapons by Syrian Arab army in Khan Sheikhon area in Idlib countryside."

By: Simon Tisdall

The US president’s preference for public bellicosity and instant military action has potential to cause a lot of damage.

Donald Trump’s warning of renewed US military action against Syria, backed by Britain and condemned by Russia, fits a now established pattern of aggressive White House behaviour favouring violence, or public threats of violence, over quiet diplomacy and private coercion. So far, the damage has been limited. But it’s early days.

Israeli entity has been regularly supplying terrorists in south of Syria with cash as well as food, fuel and medical supplies, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The paper said that Israeli army is in regular communication with ‘rebel groups’ [terrorists] and its assistance includes undisclosed payments to commanders that help pay salaries of fighters and buy ammunition and weapons.

An unnamed source told the newspaper that Israel has established a military unit that oversees the support in Syria, and set aside a specific budget for the aid.

Israel has in the past treated 3.000 wounded terrorists in its hospitals and has provided humanitarian aid such as food and clothing to civilians near the border during winter.

Czech journalist, who is specialized in Middle East Affairs, Tereza Spencerová has affirmed that both Saudi and Qatari regimes support terrorist organizations in Syria.

She told Czech 'Parliamentary Papers'  website on Friday that the difference between the Saudi and Qatari regimes lies in the fact that Saudi Arabia finances ISIS [Its Arabic acronym is Daesh] while Qatar finances al-Qaeda.

"The Saudi Arabia's recent escalation against Qatar is caused by tension of Saudi regime that has financial, social, religious and military problems. In most cases, the Saudi regime selects meaningless solutions for problems," she added.

Israeli journalist Gideon Levy has acknowledged that the Israeli entity is based on lies and it has perpetrated horrible crimes over the past 50 years of its occupation of Arab lands. 

He said in a column in Haaretz newspaper that these lies are behind the survival of the entity, which will collapse sooner or later.

"Even if the international law recognizes the entity and salutes it as it is now, this won't negate that the entity is based on lies from its very beginning ," the columnist added, indicating that were it not for lies used by the occupation to perpetrate crimes against Palestinians and Arabs, the occupation entity would collapse a long time ago.