America Taking The Lead

The US is still practicing its contradictory policy towards the crisis in Syria. The last stance of the US is to launch military attack against Syria , and it is , as usual, based on weak and trivial arguments to justify this aggression.

In fact, it is crystal clear after two years of the Syrian crisis that the US was depending on its allies such as Saudi Arabia , Qatar and Turkey. All these countries support terrorism in Syria with the continuous blanket of Israel. But the US changed its plan concerning the battle and decided to interfere publicly in Syria.

Hence , the US was displeased having witnessed the great victories achieved by the Syrian army who pursued the terrorists and eliminated them in most of the Syrian territories. The US' stance clearly leads to an inference in a direct message from Washington that "no victory over terrorism."

On the other hand, the repercussions of the British Parliament's refusal to participate in  the aggression raised a lot of questions and analyses . The French opposition has similar stance in forbidding the government from getting entangled in military attack against Syria.

As for the so-called Arab League, it is indeed a surprising and shameful stance of Arab countries. They simply jumped the gun and did not hesitate in accusing the Syrian government of using the chemical weapons even before the investigation committees and the United Nations probed into the investigation who was the side using the weapons.

Thus, most Arab countries had strongly supported the US stance to launch aggression against Syria. But on the other side, there are honorable stances of other governments which support the independency of Syria's political decision such as the BRICS countries and other friendly countries.

Moreover, no one can deny Egypt's official and popular stance towards the US aggression against Syria. Hence, Egypt has not been tempted by the Saudi Arabia's aid but on the contrary Egypt of Arabism has returned to the regional and Arabic political fold .

The Egyptian army realized that the US is trying to implement a dangerous plan aiming at destroying the Arab armies. Whereas the US began this plan in Iraq, and is seeking now to destroy Syria , then in Egypt when it supported the Muslim Brotherhood.

Whatever the results of the US' escalating stances about the aggression against Syria, Syria will remain steadfast. In conclusion every one calling for the military foreign intervention in his country must be deemed a traitor to his homeland.


Ahmed Orabi Ba'aj

E&T: Maysaa Wassouf

US Intelligence Officials: Syrian Government Not Involved in Syria's Chemical Attack


DAMASCUS,( ST)- A dozen former US military and intelligence officials have told US President Barack Obama that they are picking up information that proves Syrian government was not responsible for the chemical attack near Damascus on August 21, a warning letter to Obama said.

"We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that the Syrian government  was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the opportunity for what is commonly known as “plausible denial,” they said in their letter according to FNA.

 Here is the rest of their letter.

We have been down this road before – with President George W. Bush, to whom we addressed our first VIPS memorandum immediately after Colin Powell’s Feb. 5, 2003 U.N. speech, in which he peddled fraudulent “intelligence” to support attacking Iraq. Then, also, we chose to give President Bush the benefit of the doubt, thinking he was being misled – or, at the least, very poorly advised.

The fraudulent nature of Powell’s speech was a no-brainer. And so, that very afternoon we strongly urged your predecessor to “widen the discussion beyond …  the circle of those advisers clearly bent on a war for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic.” We offer you the same advice today.

Our sources confirm that a chemical incident of some sort did cause fatalities and injuries on August 21 in a suburb of Damascus. They insist, however, that the incident was not the result of an attack by the Syrian Army using military-grade chemical weapons from its arsenal. That is the most salient fact, according to CIA officers working on the Syria issue. They tell us that CIA Director John Brennan is perpetrating a pre-Iraq-War-type fraud on members of Congress, the media, the public – and perhaps even you.

We have observed John Brennan closely over recent years and, sadly, we find what our former colleagues are now telling us easy to believe. Sadder still, this goes in spades for those of us who have worked with him personally; we give him zero credence. And that goes, as well, for his titular boss, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who has admitted he gave “clearly erroneous” sworn testimony to Congress denying NSA eavesdropping on Americans.

Intelligence Summary or Political Ploy?

That Secretary of State John Kerry would invoke Clapper’s name this week in Congressional testimony, in an apparent attempt to enhance the credibility of the four-page “Government Assessment” strikes us as odd. The more so, since it was, for some unexplained reason, not Clapper but the White House that released the “assessment”.

This is not a fine point. We know how these things are done. Although the “Government Assessment” is being sold to the media as an “intelligence summary,” it is a political, not an intelligence document. The drafters, massagers, and fixers avoided presenting essential detail. Moreover, they conceded upfront that, though they pinned “high confidence” on the assessment, it still fell “short of confirmation”.

Déjà Fraud: This brings a flashback to the famous Downing Street Minutes of July 23, 2002, on Iraq, The minutes record the Richard Dearlove, then head of British intelligence, reporting to Prime Minister Tony Blair and other senior officials that President Bush had decided to remove Saddam Hussein through military action that would be “justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD.” Dearlove had gotten the word from then-CIA Director George Tenet whom he visited at CIA headquarters on July 20.

The discussion that followed centered on the ephemeral nature of the evidence, prompting Dearlove to explain: “But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.” We are concerned that this is precisely what has happened with the “intelligence” on Syria.

The Intelligence

There is a growing body of evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its supporters — providing a strong circumstantial case that the August 21 chemical incident was a pre-planned provocation by the Syrian opposition and its Saudi and Turkish supporters. The aim is reported to have been to create the kind of incident that would bring the United States into the war.

According to some reports, canisters containing chemical agent were brought into a suburb of Damascus, where they were then opened. Some people in the immediate vicinity died; others were injured.

We are unaware of any reliable evidence that a Syrian military rocket capable of carrying a chemical agent was fired into the area. In fact, we are aware of no reliable physical evidence to support the claim that this was a result of a strike by a Syrian military unit with expertise in chemical weapons.

In addition, we have learned that on August 13-14, 2013, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major, irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and Qatari, Turkish and US intelligence officials took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, now used as the command center and headquarters of the "Free Syrian Army" (FSA) and their foreign sponsors.

Senior opposition commanders who came from Istanbul pre-briefed the regional commanders on an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development,” which, in turn, would lead to a US-led bombing of Syria.

At operations coordinating meetings at Antakya, attended by senior Turkish, Qatari and US intelligence officials as well as senior commanders of the Syrian opposition, the Syrians were told that the bombing would start in a few days. Opposition leaders were ordered to prepare their forces quickly to exploit the US bombing, march into Damascus, and remove the Syrian government.

The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive. And they were. A weapons distribution operation unprecedented in scope began in all opposition camps on August 21-23. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish intelligence under the tight supervision of US intelligence officers.

Cui bono?

That the various groups trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad have ample incentive to get the US more deeply involved in support of that effort is clear. Until now, it has not been quite as clear that the Netanyahu government in Israel has equally powerful incentive to get Washington more deeply engaged in yet another war in the area. But with outspoken urging coming from Israel and those Americans who lobby for Israeli interests, this priority Israeli objective is becoming crystal clear.

Reporter Judi Rudoren, writing from Jerusalem in an important article in Friday’s New York Times addresses Israeli motivation in an uncommonly candid way. Her article, titled “Israel Backs Limited Strike Against Syria,” notes that the Israelis have argued, quietly, that the best outcome for Syria’s two-and-a-half-year-old civil war, at least for the moment, is no outcome. Rudoren continues:

“For Jerusalem, the status quo, horrific as it may be from a humanitarian perspective, seems preferable to either a victory by Mr. Assad’s government and his Iranian backers or a strengthening of rebel groups, increasingly dominated by Sunni jihadis."

"This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie," said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York. "Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”

We think this is the way Israel’s current leaders look at the situation in Syria, and that deeper US involvement – albeit, initially, by “limited” military strikes – is likely to ensure that there is no early resolution of the conflict in Syria. The longer Sunni and Shia are at each other’s throats in Syria and in the wider region, the safer Israel calculates that it is.

Some have seen Israel’s hand in the provenance of the most damaging charges against Assad regarding chemical weapons and our experience suggests to us that such is supremely possible.

Possible also is a false-flag attack by an interested party resulting in the sinking or damaging, say, of one of the five US destroyers now on patrol just west of Syria. Our mainstream media could be counted on to milk that for all it’s worth, and you would find yourself under still more pressure to widen US military involvement in Syria – and perhaps beyond, against Iran.

Iran has joined those who blame the Syrian "rebels" for the August 21 chemical incident, and has been quick to warn the US not to get more deeply involved. According to the Iranian English-channel Press TV, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javid Zarif has claimed: “The Syria crisis is a trap set by Zionist pressure groups for [the United States].”

Actually, he may be not far off the mark. But we think your advisers may be chary of entertaining this notion. Thus, we see as our continuing responsibility to try to get word to you so as to ensure that you and other decision makers are given the full picture.

Inevitable Retaliation

We hope your advisers have warned you that retaliation for attacks on Syrian are not a matter of IF, but rather WHERE and WHEN. Retaliation is inevitable. For example, terrorist strikes on US embassies and other installations are likely to make what happened to the US “Mission” in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, look like a minor dust-up by comparison. One of us addressed this key consideration directly a week ago in an article titled “Possible Consequences of a US Military Attack on Syria – Remembering the US Marine Barracks Destruction in Beirut, 1983.”

For the Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

Thomas Drake, Senior Executive, NSA (former)

Philip Giraldi, CIA, Operations Officer (ret.)

Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan

Larry Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)

W. Patrick Lang, Senior Executive and Defense Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.)

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst (ret.)

Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East (ret.)

Todd Pierce, US Army Judge Advocate General (ret.)

Sam Provance, former Sgt., US Army, Iraq

Coleen Rowley, Division Council & Special Agent, FBI (ret.)

Ann Wright, Col., US Army (ret); Foreign Service Officer (ret.)


Dr. Mohammad Abdo Al-Ibrahim

Myopic Leaders!

Undoubtedly, the Arab  princes and rulers owners of  oil, gas and petrodollar, suddenly   appear on the political landscape in this inopportune  time. Hence ,they are trying to change the movement of history and steal its  facts  through   helping the  foreign and colonial powers to fight  people in the region. Those rulers do their best to  offer the countries of the region a gift to America and Israel by plundering its riches and disintegrating   its  people  by inflaming the sectarian strife. 

The ulterior motive of the Arab rulers is to turn the  region back to the era of satellite colonialism. However, They are but puppets which  are greatly controlled by the  external powers. They are known by their  reckless and half-assed  policy, so they practice  all kinds of political obscenity. Why not! They have  neither  conscience  nor ordinance  in their political dictionary. For them,  the glare of  money is  predominantly stronger than  that  of thinking or equilibrium  the thing which  blinded their  insights and to become more  malicious and atrocious. 

Those Arab rulers have built their  false emirates  on straw bases, drowning  in   their dreams, irrespective of the movement of history and its greatness because they do lack  civilization. Indeed , Arab rulers  think that they have the right to control the destiny  of all countries because they have indepletable riches. But they  do forget that  there are  effective  powers  who believe  in their  issues , and have the right to make  their history.  Those people  are trying to scheme their own  future away from foreign powers which do not hesitate to meddle with  their  internal affairs.

 Certainly, those who pursue  the culture of sedition and killing, and participate  in the conspiracy against  the people of the region,  will ultimately lose the game. For the sons of this land  are  strongly attached to  their noble history and  culture. Throughout history, they  used to carry  messages of love and tolerance and renounce all forms of  violence and hatred. No doubt they will overcome  those who  have no  civilization as they emerged from the  caves  of history accompanied with their hateful primitivism and bigotry.

 Dr. Khalaf al-Meftah

E&T: Maysa Wassouf

US stand: biased, selective, hypocrite and devoid of credibility

From the very beginning of the crisis in Syria, the US has adopted double standards trying to change facts upside down, especially with regard to the political solution of the crisis. The U.S. statements and decisions towards the crisis also stress the U.S. administration's dishonesty and deceit in the efforts aimed to find a political solution to the crisis in Syria through convening the international conference in Geneva.

The reality about the U.S. intentions has been exposed to everybody as they aim for violence and terrorism to continue in Syria to disrupt security and stability in the region in service of Israeli American aggressive goals.

Since the outbreak of the crisis in Syria, the US has not stopped arming the terrorists and supplying them with all forms of support to carry out their criminal acts that target the Syrian people and the infrastructure. Throughout its Arab and regional tools, especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the US has offered various kinds of weapons and ammunition to the armed terrorist groups not to mention the highly developed technological and sophisticated communication devices.

Despite the fact that the Syrian government’s stand towards solving the crisis politically was crystal clear and its agreement to attend Geneva conference without any pre-conditions, the US alleged that the Syrian government was not willing to participate in Geneva 2 conference. Such provocative statement is not strange for the US administration which has been practicing a political duplicity since the beginning of the crisis.  This US allegation was not strange as it came from an administration that adopted an approach devoid of credibility and reliability towards all the questions in the Middle East, especially with regard to the Palestine question and the crisis in Syria. The US was distorting facts by claiming that the leadership in Syria was not willing to participate in the international conference due to be held on Syria in Geneva without preconditions.  In fact, the US administration and its allies did not like the positive response of the Syrian government and its keenness on finding a peaceful settlement for the crisis through a comprehensive national dialogue away from foreign diktat, so they started to fabricate baseless accusations against Syria. 

The US and its Western and regional allies have confirmed that the only solution for the crisis in Syrian is political, but their covert actions and clandestine policies run contrary to their public statements. At the beginning of the crisis, President Obama and senior officials at the US administration and the White House claimed that the US believes in the political solution of the crisis through dialogue away from violence. But in reality, this stand was categorically contradicted when the US administration ordered its regional allies, especially Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia to offer funds and arms to the armed terrorist groups in Syria to kill Syrians and devastate their public and private properties.  News reports said that the princes of Al-Saud have recently funneled at least $100 million to the mercenaries fighting in Syria. The latest expenditure was reportedly $50 million, spent by Saudi Arabia to buy weapons from Israel for supply to the armed groups. Most of those weapons are going to the Al Qaeda groups, such as Al Nusrah Front and Islamic State of Iraq and Sham. The princes of Al Saud also appointed the notorious Bandar Bin Sultan to supervise funding, arming and planning attacks against Syrian people and their properties.

 Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on the armed groups and members of the so-called National Syrian Council to press ahead with their criminal acts and atrocious crimes against Syrian people and refrain from taking part in any peaceful settlement or national dialogue aimed to end the crisis peacefully.  This means that the US interest in nonviolent solution is just propaganda to mislead the world public opinion and beautify the US sinister colonialist policies.

The US contradictory stand was manifested following the recent agreement between the Russian Foreign Minister Sergi Lavrov and the US Secretary of State John Kerry to hold Geneva 2 conference through which the political solution for the crisis in Syria is advocated. But this agreement was immediately breached by new US plans to provide the armed terrorist groups with highly-sophisticated weapons.  The US Secretary of State John Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov agreed on shifting the crisis into the political track while the US continues arming the opposition. Big amounts of weapons have been flowing to the armed terrorist groups in Syria and there are tens of thousands of foreign fighters fighting the Syrian army and committing horrible and savage crimes against the Syrian people. Despite the fact that the US has put Jabhat al-Nusra on its list of terrorist organizations, the US is still offering all forms of support, including arms to the terrorist groups.

The hypocrite and biased stand of the US has been exposed to world public opinion as it claims that terrorism threatens the international security and at the same time the US administration is cooperating with the same groups which they listed as terrorist, such as Al Qaeda and Jabhat al-Nusra, because this cooperation serves the American Zionist project in the region, especially targeting Syria, the key player in the axis of the resistance in the region. The US and Israel tried earlier to end this axis, especially in 2006 when Israel launched its aggression against Lebanon, but thanks to the heroic and valiant deeds of the Lebanese National Resistance men and the Syrian unlimited support, Israel was defeated in a humiliating way and the New Middle East Project proposed by former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was foiled.   

The US and its Western and regional allies have been facilitating the entry of extremist fighters to Syria after training and funding them. However, following their shameful involvement in exporting hundreds of terrorists to Syria, they began to express concern about the possible return of these terrorists to their countries. So, they encourage terrorists to commit crimes in Syria and take strict measures to prevent their return to their homelands for fear of their criminal acts.

The US doubled stand and biased approach continued regarding the armed groups’ use of chemical weapons in Khan al-Asal, near Aleppo. The Syrian government agreed to conduct an accurate and objective investigation into the possibility that chemical weapons were used in Syria and reached an agreement with the UN General Secretariat regarding having an international expert team coming to Syria.

Syria requested an honest UN investigation to look into the incident of using chemical weapons by the armed terrorist groups in Khan al-Assal area in the countryside of Aleppo which took place last March 19th and left scores of martyrs and injured among the civilians.

The UN and Syria announced late July that they reached an agreement on the work of the committee to investigate the chemical weapons use. The agreement was reached after a visit by the committee's delegation to Damascus.

The US dishonest stand towards the crisis in Syria was manifested when the US administration hindered the arrival of the UN team in charge of the investigation of chemical weapons’ use by the armed terrorist groups in Khan al-Asal and it was late for five months. The delay was deliberate to enable the armed terrorist groups to conceal evidence of using chemical weapons against Syrian citizens.

Instead of turning facts upside down, the US administration should acknowledge that the so called Syrian “opposition” has been placing several conditions to agree to hold the international conference on Syria in Geneva. This “opposition” posed several conditions to agree to hold it. The participation of the Syrian “opposition” in the Geneva conference is the main obstacle hindering it. After proposing the initiative with the US to hold the conference, Russia worked with the Syrian government which affirmed readiness to send a delegation with full authority to participate in the conference with no preconditions. But the so-called “opposition” did not give an indication about its intention to attend the conference.

The latest episode of the US conspiracy against Syria was fabricating the story of the chemical weapons alleging that the Syrian Arab Army used toxic gases in Eastern Ghuta.  The US ordered Saudi Arabia and Qatar to start a frenzied campaign and a false media fanfare through misleading channels of Al-Arabiya and al-Jazeera claiming that the Syrian Arab Army used toxic gases in al-Ghuta, Damascus Countryside. This politicised accusation came as a desperate attempt to make the Syrian people succumb to the American-Zionist pressure in light of the great victories realized by Syrian army in clearing vast areas of the terrorist groups.  The accusations came on the first day of the work of the UN committee in charge of investigating into the use of chemical weapons by the armed terrorist groups in Khan al-Asal.  The aim was crystal clear, namely to distract the UN investigation team from its original mission according to the agreement signed between the UN and the Foreign and Expatriates Ministry, because Syria has clear-cut evidence on the use of chemical weapons by the armed terrorist groups through eyewitnesses and soil and air samples. Syria has submitted clear evidence to the UN and Russia on the armed terrorist groups’ use of chemical weapons.

The US insists to accuse Syria of using chemical weapons without evidence to justify its aggression, in an attempt to keep the armed terrorist groups afloat after a series of astounding achievements by the Syrian army on the ground.

The U.S. allegations on chemical weapons use by the Syrian government in Damascus countryside are distortion of facts aimed at justifying a potential aggression against Syria and supporting the armed terrorist groups which are receiving severe blows by the Syrian Arab Army every day.

It was not sufficient for Obama’s administration to direct groundless accusations against Syrian government and army, but it went further when Obama and his aides started a frantic campaign to launch a military strike against Syria. By launching such strike, the US is working to impede all the political efforts being exerted to find a way out of the crisis in Syria.

Obama is committing the same mistakes of Bush’s administration ten years ago when he accused Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction and embarked on a disastrous war behind the UN's back. The Iraqi people are still suffering from the adverse consequences of Bush’s reckless military adventure. Violent acts and bombings are carried out by the Takfiri terrorist groups claiming the lives of scores of innocent people daily in Baghdad and several Iraqi cities.

The US and its allies are trying to impose the results of the investigation and threaten to use force against Syria in advance.  The US is seeking through these threats to make an adjustment in the balance of power to give a better bargaining position for the armed terrorist groups after they saw that the developments are not going to serve their interests anymore.

When a country violates international law, it is not for the US or its Western allies to hold it to account, for all these countries have to go back to the UN charter to see if this country did violate international law and jeopardized world peace.

US President Barack Obama has launched an intense lobbying effort on Capitol Hill to gain lawmakers’ approval for his proposed military strike against Syria. Earlier, more than 100 lawmakers signed a letter saying it would be unconstitutional for Obama to take a unilateral military action against Syria.

Obama is also facing a lack of support from allies abroad. British Prime Minister David Cameron suffered a humiliating defeat when British lawmakers refused to support his call for military strike on Syria. In addition, anti-war demonstrations have been held in different countries across the world in protest against the flagrant US military intervention in Syria.

Obama and his aides should realize that any US or foreign military intervention in Syria will have very grave repercussions, first of which would be chaos and fire which will burn the entire Middle East and Arab region. Obama's intention to launch a military strike against Syria means that it has completely succumbed to the pressure of the Zionist lobby and the US administration hardliners.  He should realize that the whole Middle East will be set ablaze if the US attacked Syria.

The US threats won’t weaken the will of Syrian people and their strong determination to fight Takfiri terrorism which targets their country and the peaceful co-existence Syria has enjoyed since time immemorial. Syria would remain as it has always been the land of amity, fraternity and tolerance and the birthplace of moderate Islam in spite of the universal war it is facing.

The Syrian people's steadfastness and the prowess of our valiant armed forces can guarantee foiling the U.S.-Israeli plots and eliminating their criminal tools in Syria which will remain the staunch defender of Arab causes.


The French “Owl” and The British “Crow”

With what those two countries are representing of a colonial history full of carnage, hatred, and persecution of people- who have already received their slice of aggression - are making a comeback today to play on the same malicious chord in their support for terrorism in Syria.

Both France and Britain are taking US echo voice roles, reflecting its dark history in supporting the bigot Zionist entity. That entity being the engine and compass directing the United States, colonial powers, oil and gas Arabs, and neo – Ottomans; in their antagonism either by authenticity or deputy, or by shabby and villainy .

France and Britain do not but see, what the United States wants to see. Therefore, Holland and Cameron 's remarks about chemical weapons are unsurprising, as well as their incitement to launch an external aggression on Syria.

Al Saud has bought the remaining scruples in king of Jordan’s court, which has currently became a planning and training main base, and the platform from which most of the wicked and aggressive plots against Syria are launched, carrying across executive orders to terrorism machine to increase innocent Syrian’s blood shedding at the hands of Takfiri killers funded and supported by Wahhabism, with the United States and its allies consent. All after, Saudi oil tank vampire undertook terrorist operations board from Oman, due to its proximity of the decision making in Tel Aviv, not having to travel great distances to communicate with interested parties and Arab event planners.

The Amman meeting of US allied armies leaders, is but an unrelenting support of terrorism, increasing its pace and beating war drums. Surely, Israelis are not far from that meeting, nor outside its lobbies; having been present in a way or another. Therefore, the situation becomes more pronounced , underlining Jordan’s official and conspiratorial role on Syria, and dropping  every made-up talk about its casting away from intervening in the Syrian crisis.

All this hysteria and shouting have been raised because the recent Syrian Arab army blows over terrorism, especially in Damascus suburbs, in addition to many other places where they suffered huge losses.

Whatsoever U.S. and its allies flutter to launch an external aggression on Syria, they well know that they cannot endure this aggression outlays, that might blowout in the region and the world.

The International status quo could change, as the United States is no longer the world's policeman, such as it was from the 1990s of last century. 

Syria will arise victorious from this crisis, history and geography do not lie. Our martyrs blood is the bridge to victory, where future generations will inherit dignity and pride .

In contrast, all those who tried to sabotage Syria will lose, and Gulf princes will pay a heavy price for betraying their homelands and contributing to the aggression against Syria, whose people will not forget those who stand by the right side, as well as also those who contributed to the destruction of their country and killing its people


Lama Hassania .